SCOTUS Sets Argument on Case with NIL Implications


An important development in the fast-changing landscape of intercollegiate athletics’ name, image, and likeness (NIL) rules may occur, when NCAA v. Alston is heard by the United States Supreme Court in March, with the Court’s decision expected to follow at some point in the summer of this year.  With a Florida bill set to become the first active NIL statute in the country on July 1, 2021, making intercollegiate student-athletes in Florida eligible to receive compensation for their NIL, without compromising their amateur status, the Court’s decision comes at a critical time in the history of NIL legislation.

The NCAA recently delayed a vote to take action on the subject of NIL at their annual January meetings.  In 2019, the NCAA’s Board of Governors had previously targeted January 2021 as a self-imposed deadline to vote on NIL, with updates to have been enacted for the 2021-22 academic year.  The delay comes on the heels of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division letter warning the NCAA that further rule changes could trigger additional legal issues. 

Alston is itself an antitrust suit, and the appeal heard by the Court in March will seek to overturn a May 2020 ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that found that the NCAA violated the Sherman Antitrust Act when it limited schools from offering certain education-related benefits to football and basketball student-athletes.  The decision also left open the door to compensation for NIL.  While it is possible that the Supreme Court will provide clarity on what has been to date an uncertain legal environment, that remains to be seen in the months ahead.

Winstead continues to monitor legislative updates surrounding NIL.  For additional updates on the subject of NIL, please see Winstead’s previously published alert on NIL in Texas.


Michael Cruciani  |  512.370.2884  |

Mike Perrin  |  713.650.2726  |

Disclaimer: Content contained within this news alert provides information on general legal issues and is not intended to provide advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.

Media Contact

Stephen Hastings
Director of Communications & Media Relations  
713.650.2485 Direct
832.343.4228 Mobile

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.


AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top