The U.S. Department Of Labor’s Conflict of Interest/Fiduciary Regulatory Package Survives Challenge in DC

11.07.16

One of the District Courts hearing challenges to the U.S. Department of Labor’s Conflict of Interest regulatory package has upheld the regulation and related prohibited transaction class exemptions, including the Best Interest Contract Exemption (the “Conflict Package”).  However, there are still other challenges pending in other courts so the journey of the Conflict Package through the litigation that will determine its fate is just beginning. The D.C. District Court upheld the Conflict Package on the challenges made by The National Association for Fixed Annuities (“NAFA”) on a number of points raised, but the court indicated that the challenge to the breadth of the Conflict Package was denied because the NAFA did not have standing to challenge the application of the Conflict Package to other parties.  For plan sponsors, plan administrators and plan fiduciaries, this means that you should expect to see changes coming from your retirement plan service provider as they attempt to come into compliance with the Conflict Package prior to April 10, 2017.

Plan sponsors should be watching for packages from their retirement plan services providers regarding how their services, agreements and fees may change under the way the service provider has structured its compliance programs in response to the Conflict Package and should investigate whether what is proposed is the only approach for your plan. 

It is particularly important to remember that some of the changes can be implemented via a notification and an opportunity to object and if you do not respond to the notification, you will be deemed to have consented to the changes (the “negative consent” permitted under the various prohibited transaction exemptions in the package).  Plan administrators and fiduciaries need to watch for communications regarding changes and to review the changes proposed via this negative consent method to document that they are prudently monitoring their retirement plan service providers and understand the agreements for their retirement plans.

Some providers are sending packages that may require the plan administrator or plan fiduciary to respond and make choices or representations that will be used to determine which of the exemptions or alternative approaches might be available to the retirement plan.  Given the potential prohibited transaction problems and litigation risks that may result from non-compliance, it will be important to watch, review and respond to these communications carefully.

Contacts:

Greta Cowart
214.745.5275
gcowart@winstead.com

Nancy Furney
214.745.5228
nfurney@winstead.com

Lori Oliphant
214.745.5643
loliphant@winstead.com

 

Disclaimer: Content contained within this news alert provides information on general legal issues and is not intended to provide advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel

Media Contact

Stephen Hastings
Director of Communications & Media Relations  
214.745.5485
shastings@winstead.com

Search Tips:

You may use the wildcard symbol (*) as a root expander.  A search for "anti*" will find not only "anti", but also "anti-trust", "antique", etc.

Entering two terms together in a search field will behave as though an "OR" is being used.  For example, entering "Antique Motorcars" as a Client Name search will find results with either word in the Client Name.

Operators

AND and OR may be used in a search.  Note: they must be capitalized, e.g., "Project AND Finance." 

The + and - sign operators may be used.  The + sign indicates that the term immediately following is required, while the - sign indicates to omit results that contain that term. E.g., "+real -estate" says results must have "real" but not "estate".

To perform an exact phrase search, surround your search phrase with quotation marks.  For example, "Project Finance".

Searches are not case sensitive.

back to top